THE CHRISTMAS LIE IS BIGGER THAN YOU THINK: It's as big as ETERNITY 



THE MASS


THE MASS OF CHRIST-MASS CHRIST-MASS is a central calendar observance of  the Roman Mass.  A practice started out of intense anti-Semitic hatred of Jews, openly confessed by the Nicene Council, and created as a substitute for the Passover Seder commanded by the REAL CHRIST. The real Christ admittedly never had anything to do with a Roman Mass and not only observed the Seder meal, but commanded his disciples to do so as well. The Mass, established as a counter to the Passover, after which [though celebrated by followers of Christ for centuries] was actually outlawed as a crime against the state of Rome.  The Mass is the ritualistic killing of an enemy of Rome at Saturnalia, and it's observance is STILL practiced as the killing of Christ to this day. CHRIST-MASS is actually not "celebrating his birth".  It is "celebrating" his execution Rome itself conducted, and scapegoated Jews on behalf of, in a doctrine called "blood liable".  It was also the official institutional rejection  by Rome, of the very blood and body of THE REAL CHRIST who was Jewish, and in form, if not letter, the New Testament version of the "Abomination of Desolation".  The actual CHRIST-MASS itself is the cloaking of the high holy day of the Roman Empire, THE SOLAR-MASS, patterned ritualistically as a form of magic, for the purpose of Imperial Emperor worship THE MASS OF CHRIST-MASS

 

SECTIONS


FEATURED VIDEO 

ROME DIDN'T 'SAVE THE PAGANS", it damned THE "CHRISTIANS"


THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ROMAN SOLAR "MASS" CALLED "CHRIST-MASS"

      THE FLESH AND BLOOD OF CHRIST

      BEAR NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE CHRIST OF THE NEW TESTAMENT

      CHRIST-"MASS" IS A SACRIFICE TO DEVILS


ORIGINS OF ROME'S SOLAR-MASS AS A "CHRIST-MASS"

     CON-JOBS, FRAUD AND DECEPTION 

       THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION

       THE INCARNATION OF THE SUN INTO THE HOST 

       POPE SIXTH III REJECTED THE BLOOD AND FLESH OF CHRIST


WHY NO "CHRISTIAN" SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN HOMAGE TO ROME'S SOLAR-MASS 

       THE CUP OF GOD'S WRATH

       THE INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS ABOUT ROME'S SOLAR-MASS TO APOLLYON

     SAVE YOURSELF

       



THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ROMAN SOLAR "MASS" CALLED "CHRIST-MASS"

SAVING THE PAGANS OR DAMNING THE CHRISTIANS?


SAVE THE PAGANS?


The "Christian" CHRIST-MASS is nothing more than a masking over of old Roman Devil worship, with the 'wink" of a fictitious Santa's eye.  "Christains" have been told a number of lies to accomplsih this amazing feat of seduction and deception, and they are all very easily transparant to anyone who is willing to honestly take a look at them.  For example, one lie that is very popular to mindlessly repeat for psuedo-evangelical Nicolaitans, and that is continually broadcast from the Vatican, is that all these customs dedicated to the worship of Satan, were "Christianized" to "save pagans".  But that was 17 centuries ago.  News flash: pagans aren't being "converted" anymore because they see Christians worshipping the Sun (as if they ever were to begin with).  


The claim is so patently absurd, it is downright offensive to anyone except the gleefully deluded.  If you said your wife had to commit prostitution in a German death camp to save someone's life, who could honestly stand in judgement? Faith is a gift, and perhaps you didn't have any?  But if that happened 50 years ago, and your wife is still an active Prostitute, with no threat to life, or any continued reason to be doing it, the claim would be met with laughter and a shake of the head, that such a lie would even be expected to be believed.  Add to that injury the insult, that in your prostitution, you claim to be the only true infallible "representative of Christ and God on EARTH", it zooms way past humorous, to complete insanity.  Such is the case with this claim about "saving people", by instituting all their customs of worshiping Satan and enforcing this devilish stew BY LAW on THE ENTIRE ROMAN EMPIRE.  And it was Satan. That is simply the Biblically theological and plain historical fact of the matter.  Any idiot who can read a Bible, much less look up the words in their original Greek and Hebrew language fully knows this to be the case, including the Nicolaitans in the Vatican and her prodigal Masonic lodges.


QUOTE: The church is little known today, but at the time it was one of the most important basilicas for Christians in Rome, Carandini said. Placing the church just a few steps from an important pagan shrine was part of Constantine's strategy of promoting Christianity while linking it to the practices of the more ancient religion.


"The church was built to christianize these pagan places of worship," Carandini said. "It was normal to put a church near these places to try to 'save' them." END QUOTE


While it may be inappropriate to point this out in a public forum, say for instance in a sociology class at a public university (although there is no reason it should be, save the pressure of Roman and Masonic Nicolaitans) , there is certianly nothing wrong with pointing it out in a theological context, in the context of a discussion about Biblical Christianity, and definitions provided from the Biblical text.  Especially to people who are pushing compulsory Christmas law, who claim themselves, to believe the Bible to be the very "Word of God".  Which brings up the unbelievable, searing and utter hypocrisy of all this that is truly beyond any excuse making or description possible.


"Worship" is not defined by what you are thinking in your head while you perform a ritual.  It is the ritual itself.  That is how it is defined both in the English dictionary... AND even in the Bible itself.  Worship in the scripture, has no reference to what you are personally thinking.  The very word itself references AN ACT!  The ACT is WORSHIP.  Not the thoughts floating around in your head.  Deceiving people into THE ACT OF WORSHIP, has a very long history in the ancient world.  And though deceived into it, the ACT was still considered to be every bit as real, as if there had been reasoned consent.  Being decieved into the worship of other gods is written about as far back as 500 - 1500 BCE in the TORAH ITSELF.


Deu 11:16  Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them; 


The word used here is ? (Pronounced "shâchâh", "shaw-khaw'") And is a primitive root; that means TO DEPRESS, that is, TO PROSTRATE, TO BOW, TO STOOP, all of which are without excpetions ACTS.  If you "Think about Jeeeesus" while you "BOW TO SATAN", what you thought in your head is literally irrelevant to the definition of what you just did.  There is NO REFERNCE TO IT, in the definition of WORSHIP, which is AN ACT.  The definition in the NEW TESTAMENT GREEEK is virtually NO DIFFERENT.


In the New Testament, the word "WORSHIP" is p??s????? (pronounced "proskuneo", "pros-koo-neh'-o",  (meaning to kiss, like a dog licking his master’s hand); to fawn or crouch to, that is, prostrate oneself in homage.  Once again, every term in it's description is purely a reference to an ACT, not what you have floating around in your head while you do it.  Understanding this definition is very important because this is the same definition that all those Latin Roman Theologians Rome likes to quote were looking at, when they came up with the idea that if "Christians" DO the ACT of worshipping Satan, they are "Christianizing" the pagan Roman "Satanists".  You see why this is SO laughable? THE ACT is THE WORSHIP. And  you CAN BE DECIEVED INTO IT, AND IT IS STILL WORSHIPPING SATAN!  If this were not true, there would be literally scores of texts in the Bible, there would be no way to explain.  Speaking on this very subject:


Rev 19:20  And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. 


Rev 20:10  And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. 


Rev 18:23  And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived. 


If what you have in YOUR HEAD is the only thing that matters, when you participate in a RITUAL ACT, these conditions of DECEPTION, and BEING DECEIVED INTO WORSHIPING SATAN would not BE POSSIBLE.  And THESE TEXTS could never have been WRITTEN.  Do you UNDERSTAND?


Who/What is this ROMAN DEVIL worshipped on December 25th? In the Roman Solar-Mass?  The same one it's always been since the writing of the New Testament.  in fact, it's even mentioned BY NAME in the New Testament, so very little "Guess work" has to be done about it, even though nobody in Rome likes to talk about all this, nor likes anyone else doing it too much either.  The NAME of the DEVIL Rome is honoring on December 25th by decieving people into worshipping it, by engaging in the ACT of homage to it's SOLAR-MASS, is APOLLYON (APOLLO).  In the New Testament, his name is given in 3 different language systems to MAKE SURE YOU CAN'T MISS IT ! THREE ! AND THEY STILL DON'T READ IT?


Rev 9:11  And they had a king over them, which is (1) the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the (2) Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the (3) Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 


ALL THREE REFERENCES SPECIFY THE IMPERIAL DEITY BORN ON THE SOLSTICE AND HONOR IN A RITUAL SOLAR-MASS (LIBATION)!  Now how are  you going to miss that? Just pretend you didn't see anything, or PRETEND you have no clue what it is talking about?  This DEVIL, was the one honored on December 25th through THE ACT of RITUAL (Which IS What Worship IS).  It's one of the best documented facts of ROMAN HISTORY.  In fact, it is SO documented, the famous secular historian Edward Gibbons, who wrote about it extensively in the classic history DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, included in Britannica's Greatest Books of the Western World series, was actually placed on their INDEX OF FORBIDDEN BOOKS, to KEEP PEOPLE FROM FINDING OUT ABOUT IT!  So there is virtually NO WAY you can pretend "Ooops, looky there! Who knew???"  You see why their claim is so laughably disingenuous? 


AND... to make all this as clear as glass to even the local Christian village idiot, if there were even an OUNCE of truth to their claim, they are all but admitting even in their excuse it was an ungodly (but necessary in their opinion) compromise. So ... they should logically now stop doing it yesterday.  But of course, do  you see even the slightest interest in that? Of course not.  The claim is another patent lie from the mouth of Roman devil worshipers who fraudulently pass themselves off to the world as "Christians".


THE "MASS" IN "CHRIST-MASS"

THE DEFINITION OF "CHRISTMAS"


CHRIST·MAS  

Pronunciation: \'kris-m?s\ 

Function: noun 

Usage: often attributive 

Etymology: Middle English Christemasse, from Old English Cristes mæsse, literally, Christ's mass 

Date: before 12th century 

1 : a Christian feast on December 25 or among some Eastern Orthodox Christians on January 7 that commemorates the birth of Christ and is usually observed as a legal holiday


MASS

Pronunciation: \'mas\ 

Function: noun 

Middle English, from Old English mæsse, modification of Vulgar Latin *messa, literally, dismissal at the end of a religious service, from Late Latin missa, from Latin, feminine of missus, past participle of mittere TO SEND

Date: before 12th century 

1.capitalized : the liturgy of the Eucharist especially in accordance with the traditional Latin rite

2.often capitalized : a celebration of the Eucharist <Sunday masses held at three different hours>


From


MISSAL - Pertaining to the Roman Catholic Mass, from MISS, and MISS*A related to MISS*LE (Literally Gifts the Roman Emperor would throw at the crowds to engender Ceasar Worship) and MISS*ION (Motive, Objective, Reason, Assignment, Task, Duty or Purpose)


Since "Christ-Mass" is a Holy Day commemorating the MASS of Christ's Birth, it is by definition both lingusitically and historically the Roman(Orthodox) Holy day commemorating the bith of the Apollo-Christ born on the winter solstice.


Thus a discussion of it's MASS is primary to understanding the TRUE MEANING OF CHRIST-MASS.  And obviously any construction of philology to discuss and explain it, is dishonest if it does not address the core of it's existence. (Such as those offered by psuedo-evangelical Roman apologists like Rick Warren)


There is no need to be intellectually dishonest about things which require no deception to be acceptable, such as should be the case about the CHRIST-MASS.


As any can see from it's definition and etymology, the CHRIST-MASS has a MISSION by definition, a term related by it's own etymology to THE ROMAN EMPEROR slinging gifts at the crowds to inspire CEASAR WORSHIP.


And it MISSION, nor it's PURPOSE,  has not CHANGED.  And while this may now be directed at the Roman definition of an ICON of a "Christ" born on December 25th, it is not the "Christ" of the Bible.


THE MISSION


PS. Saying "Uh Huh", "No it isn't", "not to me", ...doesn't change in the slightest what it is and what it was designed from the beginning to accomplish.  The basic nature of something is not changed simply because you call it by a another word.  It is still the same thing, and produces in the end, the same result.  It is no accident neo-pagans who celebrate the solar-deity, along with Protestants who defend "Christ-Mass", are increasingly being seduced into Roman Catholicism, the spiritual corrupt system of an ancient fascist Roman dictatorship, the only purpose of which was to deify it's head as god on earth, above everything worshiped or called God.  (2 Thss. 2)


THE FLESH AND BLOOD OF CHRIST

THE JEWISH PASSOVER

 

Exo 12:14 And this day [PASSOVER SEDER] shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance FOREVER.

 

THE REAL LORD'S SUPPER


Mat 26:19 And the disciples did as Jesus had appointed them; and they made ready the PASSOVER.

Mat 26:20 Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve.

Mat 26:26 And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; THIS IS  MY BODY.

Mat 26:27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;

Mat 26:28 For THIS IS MY BLOOD of THE NEW TESTAMENT, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.


Luk 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, THIS IS MY BODY which is given for you: THIS DO [NOTE: PASSOVER SEDER] IN REMEMBERANCE OF ME.

Luk 22:20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, THIS CUP [THE SEDER CUP] is THE NEW TESTAMENT in MY BLOOD, which is shed for you.



THE SMOKING GUN

THE ORIGIN OF THE EUCHARIST

 


325 AD COUNCIL OF NICEA-

 

It is unbecoming beyond measure that on this holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews. Henceforth let us have nothing in common with this odious people...We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews...our worship follows a...more convenient course...we desire dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews...How, then, could we follow these Jews http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_pers1.htm


TRANSLATION:

We don't care what Jesus said, we are not about to insult ourselves by acting like a bunch of stinking Jews on Passover.


Antisemitism plain and simple straight from the mouth of the Nicene council.  Such intense Antisemitism it even repudiates and denies the very ethnicity of the one they claim to be following.


Eph 2:12  That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

Eph 2:13  But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

Eph 2:14  For he is our peace, who hath made both one

 

COMPARE:

QUOTE:

“We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews”

“We desire dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews”

 

PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TOWARD MEN?

Would that be Jewish or non-Jewish men?

 

1Jo 2:18-19  Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, … They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.

 

BEAR NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE "TRUE CHRIST"

"There can be no two things more different than the celebration of the Lord's Supper in a Christian home in the first century and in a cathedral in the twentieth century. The things are so different it is almost possible to say that they bear no relationship to each other whatsoever." WILLIAM BARCLAY, THE LORD'S SUPPER, P. 132, Del Birkey


Though this observation is made by William Barclay, whom most consider a fairly conservative theologian, on the other end of the theological spectrum Paul Tillich made virtually the same observation concerning the modern Church in general, without respect to the singular issue of the Cathedral communion or Eucharist rituals.


The fact is theologians know precisely how and where these changes arose, and rather than spend their time persuading people to return to the original practices of the early ecclesia documented in the New Testament, they spend virtually all their time building arguments of logic and innuendo justifying the known and rather dramatic departures.  (As though the departure is superior in some respect to what Christ actually intended and commanded?)  And of course, if their argumentations and logically innuendos are fully correct, there would obviously be no point in continuing the pretense of belief in "Christ", anymore than in Buddha, the Dali Lama,  or the Emperor of Japan.


Yes, the theologians are correct. It is not only possible to say there is no relationship, it's quite factual. There is none.  And that should concern anyone who has chosen Christ as their example, or teacher, or inspiration, or certainly as their "Lord and savior" in life to follow.  To the extent it does not, is the same extent to which you as a religious consumer can rest assured you have been conned by the fraud of an impostor, selling you a worthless synthetic substitute for 10% of your annual salary.


To the extent which you believe the Mass, Communion, Eucharist, Love feast, Love fest, Woodstock, or whatever other name you wish to christen the rubber life boat you think has some mysterious efficacious powers toward either your sanctification or salvation, in drinking Welchade from a little plastic thimbleful, or Roman goblet during the birth of the sun, to that same extent you will be dissappointed to discover the rubber life boat is flammable, and the lake it is floating on, is one of fire.


Not that it should concern you, because it doesn't concern your religious leader in the least either, who obviously doesn't think it actually really matters, except when it comes to convincing outsiders they need a spiritual ticket to ride in his eternal rubber flammable boat.  Since it doesn't bother him, it shouldn't bother you, and if you do not believe this, just ask him to explain it to you, and he will be more than happy to do so.  After all, that is why you are paying him 10% of your annual salary anyway, to explain to you all the reasons why it is good and proper to disobey the one you claim to be following.  And you need to feel confident that that is precisely what he is spending most of his entire study day doing in his little office on your behalf, just for you, and your 10% contribution.  Despite this grotesque crack in the nuclear core of the phony religion they are all peddling, you have nothing to worry about.  Your 10% is after-all, tax deductible.


THE "CHRIST-MASS" AS A SACRIFICE TO DEVILS

CHRIST-MASS IS THE RE-SACRIFICE OF CHRIST


"...the nature of the ministerial priesthood proper to a Bishop and a priest, who offer the Sacrifice in the person of Christ and who preside over the gathering of the holy people, is evident in the form of the rite itself, by reason of the more prominent place and office of the priest. the Church’s offering and the Victim by whose immolation God willed to be appeased; 4 and he prays that the Body and Blood of Christ may be a sacrifice acceptable to the Father and salvific for the whole world." - INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI, MAY 2007


CHRIST-MASS IS PUTTING CHRIST TO OPEN SHAME

IT IS FINISHED


Joh 19:30  When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. 


ONCE FOR ALL


1Pe 3:18  For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:


Heb 10:9,10  Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second. By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. 


OPEN SHAME


Heb 6:6  If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.


THE "CHRIST-MASS" IS THE SOLAR SACRIFICE TO SATURN (SATYR)


Since "Christ-Mass" is a ritual introduced by Rome to ASSIMILATE and SYNTHESIZE the Paganism of the Roman Sun-god CULT with MONOTHEISTIC JUDAISM, it is not surprising to discover that the rituals of it's MASS predate it's institution as a "Christian" celebration.  This would be entirely expected.  What is perhaps not expected, is that Biblically literate people who should both know and care much better, would be willing to ASSIMILATE their own souls, with what is identified in their Bibles as DEVIL WORSHIP.


Deu 32:5,17-22  They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children: they are a perverse and crooked type. They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation.  For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains. 


This text was written about unauthorized "sacrifices" being offered to the solar-deity in "Bema houses" [unauthorized Templum-cultus] which was being assimilated by Israel into's it's religious practices.  The solar-deity condemned here, known by various names throughout the levant region, is later mentioned as Tammuz in Ezekeil 8 centuries later.  The verdict by the prophet's against it's syncretistic assimiliation remains consistently condemned, reguardless of the name.


Millenia later, it's assimiliation (as Apollyon) among people who would claim to follow "Christ" remains unchanged. Rev. 9:11.  It is still called "Abahd" "dohn" (Abbadon) which means in Hebrew the "Lord of Hell".


 

THE "CARCASS" AND THE "REAL PRESENCE" OF CHRIST IN THE ROMAN MASS

THE EAGLE WAS THE STANDARD OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE


 THE MOST MISQUOTED TEXTS IN THE ENTIRE NEW TESTAMENT


The question was the most logical question that could have possibly been asked after being told the Temple was going to be destroyed, and the follow chapter detailing the discourse by Jesus (i.e.,Yeshua) to the question, is the most logical response he could have possibly given, none of which Christians ever here from their preachers.


Instead this fairly simple text ends up contorted to refer to a smörgåsbord of esoteric mysterious end of the world predictions that are actually no where to be found in the pages of this chapter, often much less the entire Bible.  And to make matters worse, in order to pull off all these contorted hermetical gymnastics, they intentionally completely ignore several key and rather large points in the text itself that anchor it to a time in history when none of it would either make sense or even could actually occur outside of it's very clearly defined historical context. But... that doesn't stop them from turning Christ into a prophetic idiotic, and the major body of evangelical Christians in the world, the laughing stock of every antagonist on the internet beyond a second grade education.


THE PREDICTION: The TEMPLE will be DESTROYED

THE QUESTION: What will destroy it? When will it happen? What will be THE SIGN of the MESSIAH'S PRESENCE in ISRAEL?


THE DISCUSSION


THE HOUR IS COMING WHEN NEITHER IN THIS MOUNTAIN, NOR EVEN AT JERUSALEM


Joh 4:21-24  Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.


THE CARCASS OF THE TEMPLE CULT


Mat 24:1-2  And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.


WHEN WILL THESE THINGS BE?


Mat 24:3-4  And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy PRESENCE, and of the end of the age?


THREE LOGICAL QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE DISCIPLES


(1) WHEN WILL THIS HAPPEN? (THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE)


(2) WHAT WILL BE THE "SIGN" OF THE MESSIAH'S PRESENCE? (IN ISRAEL WITHOUT THE TEMPLE)


(3) WHAT WILL BE THE END OF THE AGE? (OF THE TEMPLE)


Note: These three questions have absolutely nothing to do with the end of the world.  They are asking about the end of the TEMPLE.


THREE LOGICAL ANSWERS TO THREE LOGICAL QUESTIONS


(1) THERE WILL BE WARS AND RUMORS OF WARS (BUT THAT WILL NOT DESTROY IT)


Mat 24:6  And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.


Logically, the first thing that happens in a military conflict in the ancient world, is that the enemy sacks THE TEMPLE.  But he is saying that this will not be the end of THE TEMPLE.  This has nothing to do with the end of the world. Nor with "wars" at the end of the world.  It is a discussion about what is going to DESTROY THE TEMPLE.




(2) THERE WILL BE EARTHQUAKES, FAMINE AND CONFLICT (BUT THAT WILL NOT DESTROY IT)


Mat 24:7  For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes


Once again, because ancient temple were large structures, and because they were built out of stone, one of the first things to go in an earthquake is THE TEMPLE.  But he is telling them that it will not be destroyed by an earthquake.  Once again, this has nothing to do with the end of the world, nor is it a prediction about earthquakes at the end of the world.  In fact, the New Testament doesn't actually predict an end of the world, it predicts the beginning of a new one, but even these texts are found elsewhere, this is NOT the discussion they are having at this point.  This discussion is about WHAT IS GOING TO DESTROY THE TEMPLE, that Christ JUST GOT FINISH TELLING THEM WAS GOING TO BE DESTROYED.


(3) THERE WILL BE THE "ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION" PROPHESIED BY DANIEL.(THEN IT WILL BE DESTROYED) AS WILL BE THE ENTIRE NATION OF ISRAEL


Mat 24:15-16  When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: 


THEN


Mat 24:17  Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: 


Mat 24:18  Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. 


Mat 24:19  And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! 


Mat 24:20  But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 


Mat 24:21  For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. 


Mat 24:22  And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. 


Now here is where all the trouble starts. For some reason, the average fat bald boisterous evangelical TV preacher in America, suddenly and mysteriously skips to the end of the world and his fantasy rendering of a long gone 10 nation European Economic Union, a sci-fi superman antichrist or an IBM super-computer in the holy of holies, and a third temple, and first tatoos,, then bar codes, then RFD tracking chips and brain implants, on and on and on the story goes. (Always changing to fit the new circumstances)  And yet, there is absolutely nothing about any of this in this text. Nothing.  This text is clearly anchored to a specific time and place in history.  It is clearly anchored to the historical conditions and geography of 1st century Israel.  


(1) Judea is a geo-political entity that does not even exist anymore, and never will.  It is a text that CAN NEVER BE FULFILLED at this point in history.  There is NO JUDEA!  But there was in 70 CE.


(2) It wouldn't make a whole lot of difference whether you are on top of a mountain or not in modern nuclear warfare.  But that wasn't true in 70 CE.


(3) It really has no bearing on modern day transportation if you are fleeing in Israel in the summer or the winter, as Buses, SUVs and Cars run on roads the same in either temperature.  But it certainly mattered in 70 CE when people traveled on donkeys, camels and in wagons.


(4) And riding in a modern vehicle does not impede breast feeding.  But it certainly did in 70 CE.


(5) And people no longer live in houses where they "flee from their rooftops", most live in apartment buildings. They take the stairs and elevators. But they certainly did have roof flats in 70 CE.


Placing this text out of it's historical context, into modern day Israel is no different than preaching from Freudian Inkblots.  No of course, you can't blame the ministers who are working for their 10%.  It's their job to entertain  you with their speeches on Sunday with sensational fantasies that pack in a good crowd and increase their membership.  But you as a religious consumer should not encourage your religious leader to be lying to you in such a blatant and inexcusable manner, without the slightest question or reproof.


THEN


(AFTER THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE)

 THE REAL REASON THEY DISTORT AND CONTORT THIS TEXT IN MATTHEW


If you are wondering why such a butchery job is done on this text in Matthew, you are about to find out.  What it REALLY TEACHES certainly needs all the camoflauging the local preacher can offer it, because in it's real and raw form, read as it is actually written, it delivers an incredibly damning message to your minister.  And after all, you pay him to think up professional excuses for disobeying Christ, and there is no better real text in the New Testament to ignore, disobey and reject what Christ actually says, than right here in Matthew 24.  Because it is an absolutely lovely blanket condmenation of pretty much all that your minister teaches and preaches from his Roman Cathedral pulpit every Sun-day.


Mat 24:23-28  Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christoi, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Behold, I have told you before. Wherefore if they shall say unto you, (1) Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: (2) behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the [PRESENCE] of the Son of man be. For (3) wheresoever the carcase is, there will THE EAGLES be gathered together.


THE PAROUSIA OF CHRIST IS NOT IN THE ROMAN MASS


And IF and WHEN you DO begin to examine the contents of this warning, you will find nothing short of the very profile of Roman theology concerning it's MASS, in whom Christ's PAROUSIA (PRESENCE), is said to reside.  It provides another unmistakable road sign, on the path to Romanism's apostate ascendancy under the guise of it's own false "Christ".


(1) HIS PRESENCE IS IN THE DESERT


The DESERT FATHERS claimed Christ's PAROUSIA was found in the DESERT through their asceticism. The same asceticism that was prophesied to be the mark of future "false prophets" who would come "in Christ's name" after the destruction of Israel, forbid marriage, be vegetarian, and claim his PAROUSIA would be localized to their desert cultus.


(2) HIS PRESENCE IS IN THE SANCTUARY 


Thus the senseless man... does not ask "where is the TEMPLE into which I should go to worship... On account of his senselessness he is worst than a PAGAN" v. 34, p282 THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY

 

As the monastic movement of the desert gnostics developed, it laid increasing emphesis on emergant templum-cultus which had been discontinued in the OLD COVENANT before the JEWISH REFORMATION of the NEW COVENANT.  They began to develop "inner sanctums" (holy rooms) where sacerdotal ritualism was practiced as an early form of gnostic magic.


Heb 9:8-11,24  The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standing: Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience; Which stood only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation. But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:


(3) HIS PRESENCE IS IN THE CHURCH


THE MARK OF THE "FALSE PROPHETS" AND THEIR "FALSE CHRISTS" IS THAT THEY "GATHER" AT THE "CARCASS" OF TEMPLE CULT AND CLAIM CHRIST'S "PAROUSIA" IS FOUND THERE


PANEGYRIC ON THE BUILDING OF THE CHURCHES, ADDRESSED TO PAULINUS, BISHOP OF TYRE: "...And thou, O excellent ornament of this new and holy temple of God endowed by him with the wisdom of the age... has granted the distinguished privilege of rebuilding and renewing it to Christ ...his holy and divine spouse: whether one might call thee a  new Beseleel, the architect of a divine tabernacle, or a Solomon, the king of a new and better Jersualem, or a new Zerubbabel, superadding a glory to the temple of God, much greater than the former.....so have we seen, in the city of the Lord of hosts, in the city of our God. And in what city but in this newly built and framed by God? "I was glad when they said unto me, we will go into the  house of the Lord: and again,Lord I have loved the beauty of thine house, and the place where thy honor dwelleth." They also confess Christ the Son of God... in the midst of the city which holds sway over the whole earth. Witness the splendid ornaments and donations of this very temple, which themselves are noble and truly grand, worthy of admiration and astonishment, and expressive symbols of our  Saviours's kingdom. Next to him, however, the second place immediantly devolves on one alone of his equals, the presiding prelate and leader of this host, who has been honored by the first and great High Priest himself with the second in rank in this sanctuary, and has been appointed by him... obtaining this people of yours as his portion by the judgement and allottment of the Father; a new Aaron or another Melchisedech assimilated to the Son of God.  (Pgs. 406-418) - EUSEBIUS ECCLESASTICAL HISTORY


In the local Church, first place should certainly be given, because of its significance, to the Mass at which the Bishop presides, surrounded by his presbyterate, deacons, and lay ministers, and in which the holy People of God participate fully and actively, for it is there that the pre-eminent expression of the Church is found.<> When the Lord was about to celebrate with his disciples the Passover meal in which he instituted the Sacrifice of his Body and Blood, he gave instructions that a large, furnished upper room should be prepared (Lk 22:12). The Church has always regarded this command as applying also to herself when she gives directions about the preparation of people’s hearts and minds and of the places, rites, and texts for the celebration of the Most Holy Eucharist.<> The celebration of the Eucharist in a particular Church is of utmost importance. - INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI, MAY 2007


Act 17:23-25  ...Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;


Act 7:48-51  Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? Hath not my hand made all these things? (1) Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, (2) ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.


(1) "UNCIRMCISED IN HEART"


This is a phrase indicating the lack of God's presence, the abscence of God's Spirit...i.e., THE PAROUSIA of CHRIST.


Rom 2:28-29  For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.


Php 3:3  For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.


(2) "RESIST" THE HOLY SPIRIT


??t?p?pt?

antipipto

an-tee-pip'-to

From G473 and G4098 (including its alternate); TO OPPOSE: - resist.



??t?

anti

an-tee'

A primary particle; OPPOSITE, that is, INSTEAD  Often used in composition to denote CONTRAST


"ANTI" as in "ANTI"-CHRIST.


THE HOLY SPIRIT is not PRESENT when it is the HOLY SPIRIT that you are fighting.  There may be A SPIRIT present, but it is not the same one the Bible is referring to as "God".


It is THIS SPIRIT:


THE SPIRIT THAT IS PRESENT IN APOLLO'S CHRIST-MASS


1Ti 4:1-3  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. 


Earliest accounts of mixing "Christ" with the worship of the sun-god (Ha Sawtawn) occur among these "desert fathers" in Egypt, where even the Roman Catholic Origen mentions the practice in condemnation. 


[On the walls of the cliff tombs where the Nag Hammadi library was discovered are crosses painted on the walls along with prayers to "Zeus Sarapis" mixed in with PSLAMS from the Bible]. - p.20, Nag Hammadi Library, Robinson 


Who is "Zeus Sarapis"?

 

Zeus (also spelled Seus)  the father "God" of the pantheon ..."Sar" [son of] ..."Apis" the Sun. Seus SarApis became the Greco-Roman Je-Sus born on the SOLAR SOLSTICE, Dec. 25th, the "traditional" birthdate of the solar-god throughout the ancient world.

Origen denounces the idea of  the syncretistic pagan celebration of Chirst’s birthday as though he were an ungodly Pharaoh. 245 AD,  - "Natal Day", The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1913.


CHRIST-MASS IS A DEPARTURE FROM THE FAITH


Jud 1:3  Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.


THE FAITH that was ONCE DELIVERED to the saints, did not include observance of Apollo's Birth at the Winter Solstice. Far from it. [Even according to Roman Catholic admission]  To observe it, is to DEPART FROM THE FAITH ONCE DELIVERED to the saints.


CHRIST-MASS IS A DEPARTURE FROM THE TRADITION OF THE APOSTLES


(Intended to protect you from the Anti-christ)


2Th 2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away [DEPARTURE] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;


2Th 2:15  Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle. 


The APOSTLES taught no Tradition of observing Apollo's birth date by mixing it with the "celebration" of "Christ".  Doing it is "Falling Away" from the traditions taught by the Apostles.  And the whole point of keeping those things which were IN THE TRADITION OF THE APOSTLES, was to avoid "falling prey" to the coming MAN OF SIN, the SON OF PERDITION, who would be revealed to the whole world by his exaltation of himself over everything that is worshipped or called God (2 Thss 2:4), claim to BE CHRIST (Mat 24:5)  and his demand that the world worship a Roman ICON (Rev. 13:5) in "Christ's name".


And the "Christ-Mass" and it's Roman Icon,  is precisely and specifically exactly that.


How often do you hear Protestant Pastors claim the reason they continue the practice even though they know it is a fraud, is that it brings many people out to their "Church" who would not otherwise come any other time of year?  The question is, when they come to gather at the carcass, what "Christ" are these Pastors giving these people?


OBEDIENCE TO THE TRADITION OF THE APOSTLES IS NOT SIMPLY OPTIONAL


 2Th 3:6  Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us. 


COMMAND, means to ORDER, INSIST, CHARGE. pa?a??????, paraggello, PRON.par-ang-gel'-lo ; to transmit a message, that is, to enjoin: - (give in) charge, (give) command (-ment), declare.


It is simply a recognized historical fact, verified by the documentary evidence of the text of the New Testament itself, that THE TRADITION OF THE APOSTLES, was (and still is) the KEEPING OF PASSOVER, and not "CHRIST-MASS".  Because these changes affect the very "PARADOSIS" (or Body of Tradition involving the transmission of the Euangelion itself), the New Testament, and Paul specifically, (the very one charged with being secretly a Gentile) PAUL COMMANDS, that every real believer or follower of the REAL CHRIST, withdraw or separate themselves, from anyone refusing to keep these traditions.  That is as strong as it gets in the New Testament aside from the carte blanc statement you are going to Hell.


And despite the fact that these truths are known and even admitted from history, from the very words of the Nicene council itself, to the clear texts in the New Testament, Christian Churches twisted, stretch and mangled the very words of these plain and obvious texts into all kinds of gymnastics to avoid the obvious,... and simply REPENT.  Thus proving to YOU and to the WHOLE WORLD, and everyone reading this web page, from every country on earth, no matter what your religious profession might be... that these people are IMPOSTERS, and have been so for 1700 years.


It is very easy for a real follower of Christ to REPENT.  They simply discover a truth, admit their previous error, and change accordingly, which can be done in the blink of an eye.  But for an historical fraud that has claimed the lives of millions of people, while pronouncing their own absolute infallible authority over the whole earth as the only real legitimate Representative of either Christ or God on the planet in the history of mankind, from the lofty throne of power of the Roman empire, such changes (Repentence) can never come without an admission of guilt. (Thus why it will never happen)


So  if you do consider yourself a REAL follower of Christ, you are left with two biblical choices in reference to your Protestant minister (1) Approach him, and ask him to repent showing him the truth from history and the scripture, and/or (2) Withdraw yourself from him.  There are no other options given in the scriptures.  And the reason this was "commanded", was for your own protection against the coming of THE MAN OF SIN. (Which all slaughtered Thessalonians, and later Protestant denominations at one time clearly and correctly understood to be the papacy of Rome)


ORIGINS OF ROME'S SOLAR-MASS AS A "CHRIST" MASS

CON-JOBS, FRAUD AND DECEPTION

THE USUAL SUSPECTS


"in the study of the holy Fathers ...shed light upon the theology of the mystery of the Eucharist through the teachings of such illustrious Fathers of Christian antiquity as St Irenaeus, St Ambrose, St Cyril of Jerusalem, and St John Chrysostom." - INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI, May 2007


Any discussion of the Eucharist always leads back to the same crew of "Church Fathers" primarily because as it is sometimes admitted, along with CHRIST-MASS, it does not exist in the New Testament.  To bridge the gap between what is obvious practice and teaching in the New Testament, to the completely alien and DEPARTED practices of Modern Rome and it's daughter Churches, one has to justify those many extravagant departures through some form of "logic" to it's ciritics.


That justification is always found the same way.  Through an appeal to what Rome has always done best, re-writing history.  Rome always looks to the same handful of Post-New Testament men that Rome alone had chosen from literally a vast empire of possiblitiies, and had both the followers of, and the writings of, all the rest burned and exterminated.  The assurances that Rome picked the right people to kill and the right books to burn always end up reverting back to "well Rome knows best".  So it hardly makes for a truly honest or convincing argument.  And casts more suspiscion on these men than credibility to any objective student of history.


Especially if you examine these so-called "fathers" in any ciritical detail.  The claim is made in their defense that they are "accepted" by this group and that group and this council and that council followed with percentages, polls and relgious celebrity endorsements, which are all very impressive citations of a long history of aberant contradictory apostacy but establish nothing in the way of actual history, or Biblical theology, rending their citations only relevent to audiences that wish them to be so. (i.e., wishful thinkers)


IGNATIUS AND IRENAEUS FATHER OF THE "MASS" OF "CHRIST-MASS"


The very first to be cited in this long history of error, is actually it's author, and often admittedly so by it's own advocates.  While the INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI cites Irenaeus as it's first in the list, most Catholic priests will begin by pointing first to Ignatius. And from there, the practice of the Eucharist is traced to (Saint) Irenaeus.  Ironically, what most do not realize, is that far from legitamizing the Eucharist by pointing to it's origin in these men, it clearly does exactly the opposite.  It points to the illegitamacy of these men as historically Apostolic, and that is not the only evidence one has at their disposal to do so.  The "fathers" of Rome's own apostacy are precisely that.  What they have preserved is nothing less than a clearly defined record of how they "fell away" and "departed" from the Apostolic faith one reads about in the New Testament.  While the history and testimony of those who remained faithful to the practices and traditions of the New Testament may have been snuffed out, they did not snuff out a clearly defined, and admittedly embraced, record of their own Apostacy, and the men who are historically responsible for all these many errors.


This record in a certain sense is as valuable, as having had the ones they by thier own admission, snuffed out of existence.   By studying them critically, one can see in their own words, and in their own admissions, precisely what DEPARTURES from Biblical faith, they were indulging, and why they were doing it.  So even though one does not have the written record of whatever traditions remained static with the New Testament practices and beliefs, we do have thanks to Rome, the record of those who departed from it, complete with their own explanations of why.  (Which in some ways is even better) 


If a community remained essentially static with New Testament practices, there would not be much to "add" to it, obviously.  The most critical need for documentation would be the departures themselves and why they were embraced.  Which we do have thanks to Rome, but obviously not for the reasons Rome intended.


The claims made for these "Apostolic fathers" are not substantiated by the basic facts of familiarity with either the Apostolic teaching found in the New Testament from the actual Apostles, or even such basic things as commonly known details about the life of Christ. 


the mystery of the Eucharist through the teachings of such illustrious Fathers of Christian antiquity as St Irenaeus- INSTITUTIO GENERALIS MISSALIS ROMANI, May 2007


As you can see from the Missalis Romani quote above, Irenaeus is directly credited with the "teaching" of the Roman Eucharist based on the claim that he was an "Apostolic father".  That claim, along with the others, is contradicted by the basic facts concerning Irenaeus knowledge of the life of Christ. 



More information on the "Church Fathers" is discussed in the section entitled the "Church" of Christmas, listed in the navigation bar at the top and bottom of this page.


THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION


What you will see documented below, is how Rome replaced not only the New Testament Christ with Apollo, but even that the very blood and flesh of that New Testament Jewish Christ was openly and fully rejected.  The scripture in 1 John that the "spirit" of the "antichrist" denies the FLESH of CHRIST is even cited by Roman apologists as the final and ultimate proof, the Pope is not the Anti-christ.  The only problem. of course, is that he did PRECISELY THAT.  And he did so in the instutition of the Christ-Mass, no less.  Christ-mass is a full and complete rejection of the blood and body of Christ.  And in so being, it is also the New Covenant version of something technically known as the "Abomination of Desolation", which American pseudo-evangelical Chiliasts always cite as proof the Pope is not yet the Antichrist because hasn't been done. (Which of course he has, right under their noses)


THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION


Rev 14:10  The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 


THE "CUP" OF "CHRIST-MASS"


The ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION is expression that refers to the desecration of the Temple by the erection of a statue of Zeus in its sacred precincts by Antiochus IV Epiphanes written about in Daniel.


Dan 11:31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.


1 Maccabees uses the term to point to the actions of Antiochus IV Epiphanes in the mid-second century BC when, he set up an altar to Zeus in the Second Temple in Jerusalem, and sacrificed swine on it around the year 167 BC.


The term "ABOMINATION" occurs 76 times throughout the Bible in 69 verses and is used concpiciously to refer to the sin of Idolatry.  4 Verses record it's usage in the New Testament.


Of the 4 verses that cite the term, 2 refer to the events leading to the destruction of in 70 AD. 


Mat 24:15  When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 

Mat 24:16  Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:


Mar 13:14  But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:


(Which is precisely what Jews in Israel did, thus why the Dead Sea Scrolls were found hidden in the mountains) Taking these texts out of historical context to apply them to the end of the world is quite a stretch beyond just the butchering of the text.  Some of it couldn't happen even if everyone on earth wanted to stage it as a play.  "Judea" literally no longer exists.


Mat 24:20  But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day:


And today, since we travel in cars and planes, rather than donkey's and camels, it really wouldn't make much difference if it were a Sabbath or in the Winter. The trip takes only a couple of hours to go the entire distance of the country.  It is clear Christ was not referring to a post-diaspora Israel thousands of years later.


The third use of the term "Abomination" in the New Testament gives it an applicatory definition to things which are highly esteemed among earthy men but that are morally or spiritually corrupt:


Luk 16:15 And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.


Once again, referring back to it's common usage as a term for Idolatry.


The 4th use is found in Revelation as something descriptive of the "New Jerusalem":


Rev 21:27  And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.


One of the claims that many make, although there is literally nothing in the New Testament that actually prophesies this, is that the Antichrist will commit the Abomination of Desolation.  Here is how one website explains their concept of it:


Most Bible prophecy interpreters believe that Jesus was referring to the Antichrist, who will do something very similar to what Antiochus Epiphanes did. This is confirmed by the fact that some of what Daniel prophesied in Daniel 9:27 did not occur in 167 B.C. with Antiochus Epiphanes. ... Whatever the future abomination of desolation is, it will leave no doubt in anyone’s mind that the one perpetrating it is the person known as the Antichrist. Revelation 13:14 describes him making some kind of image to which all are forced to bow down and worship. Turning the Temple of the Living God into a place of worship for himself is about as much of an abomination in God’s eyes as there could possibly be.


(1) Making an "Image" (Which is literally the word "Icon", they always avoid using)


(2) Turning the Temple of the Living God into a place of worship FOR HIMSELF.


(3) Taking away the "sacrifice" and


(4) "defiling" the Temple with Idolatry, making it "desolate".


So THE PATTERN of this concept of ANTICHRIST is seen in ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES.  The Roman Christ-Mass does all 4 of these things, and there is much more to the fulfillment of this pattern in the "Christ-Mass" than you have been told.  If you saw that the "Christ-Mass" fulfilled the pattern of the "Abomination Of Desolation", if not in a very real sense historically, at the very least in it's spiritual sense,  would you still do it?


1. ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES WAS FROM ANTIOCH, SYRIA


2. ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES WAS ANTI-SEMITIC


3. ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES STOPPED THE TEMPLE SACRIFICE


4. ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES REPLACED THEM WITH PIG SACRIFICE


5. ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES ERECTED AN IDOL OF ZEUS IN THE TEMPLE PRECINCT


CHRIST-MASS IS THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION


[Abomination of Desolation] The phrase shíqqûç shômem stands for the original expression bá' ál shámáyîm (Baal of heaven), a title found in Phoenician and Aramaic inscriptions, and the semitic equivalent of the Greek Zeus, Jupiter, but modified in Daniel through Jewish aversion for the name of a Pagan deity. While thus disagreeing as to the precise sense of the Hebrew phrase usually rendered by "the abomination of desolation", Christian scholars are practically at one with regard to its general meaning. - New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia


1. IT CAME FROM ANTIOCH SYRIA


The founder of the Eucharist was Ignatius of Antioch Syria - The same exact city Antiochus Epiphanes was from. (It is also one of the most Anti-semitic places on earth to this very day)


2. IT WAS CREATED OUT OF ANTI-SEMITISM


Ingatius openly states that one of the reasons he introduced the "Eucharist" was to "Separate himself" from "living as a Jew", which he considered himself superior to, in his own confessions.  Thus setting the stage for centuries of viral antisemtic theology among "christians" in the following millenia who read this early Nazi offering from Rome's cooked history books.


For if we are still practicing Judaism, we admit that we have not received God’s favor…it is wrong to talk about Jesus Christ and live like Jews. For Christianity did not believe in Judaism, but Judaism in Christianity. - Ignatius Bishop of Antioch (98-117A.D.) Epistle to the Magnesians


Compare:


Joh 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. - Christ


1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.


And what exaclty was John speaking about when he was speaking about people who "went out from them"? You will never guess what is in the PREVIOUS VERSE!


1Jn 2:18  Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. 


1Jn 2:19  They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.


 3. THE BLOOD SACRIFICE IN THE TEMPLE WAS STOPPED


Ignatius refused to practice the command actually given to the real disciples, by the real Christ, precisely because he was too anti-semitic to stomache anything Jewish.  In so doing, he STOPPED the practice of the actual Passover commanded by Christ to his disciples found in the gospels. Later under Sixth III and his Theodosius II Codex, it was made Roman law, and Christian Passovers were made a crime against the Roman empire.


While Protestants do not generally accept the idea that the "Blood" of the "Lord's Supper" is "his blood" in a literal way (which was actually a Passover), it must be admitted that the text itself calls it HIS BLOOD.  Yet that is precisely THE BLOOD that was STOPPED by Rome, and REPLACED with something else. (as you will see below)  Rome has damned even babies to hell because they do not have "The Blood" which they claim to be the "possessors of" through their Eucharist.  This "judgement" is also a measure by which according to Christ, they will "be judged".  If the Eucharist is NOT THE BLOOD that Christ commanded, but a pagan apostate substitute, then that judgement of damnation is one to be recieved by it's giver, not the recipient to whom it is flung.  And such is in fact the case according to the Bible.


If  you accept THE BLOOD of the "Lord's Supper" as THE SACRIFICE (Be it symbolic or literal) , then it can only be admitted that it is this very sacrifice that has BEEN STOPPED IN THE TEMPLE.


In the New Testament, the "Temple" is not defined as the building on the physical Mount Zion in Jerusalem, but the spiritual body of Christ's following.  The image of the idol is erected and stands today in the "Holy Place" where the blood of Christ's sacrifice is offered before God.


1Co 3:16  Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?


1Co 3:17  If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.


1Co 6:19  What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?


2Co 6:16  And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.


Eph 2:21  In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:


Rev 3:12  Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.


4. IT WAS REPLACED WITH A PIG


Rejecting the Jewish Passover written about in the Bible, the Pope offered in it's place the additional practice of "Christ-Mass" to syncronize the beginning of the year with the Roman sun-god, officiated by Sixth III. 


It replaced the mark of Passover as the beginning of the ecclesastical year (as it was for New Testament Jews) with it's "Christ-Mass", and offered it's companion apostacy "Easter", complete with eating an honorary Ham intead of a Lamb, and looking for Babylonian fertility eggs, after the customs of pagans in celebration of Ishtar. All made compulsary Roman Law under Sixth III on pain of legal prosecution.


5. AN IMAGE (ICON) OF APOLLO-CHRIST (BAAL OF HEAVEN) WAS INTRODUCED TO BE WORSHIPPED BY COMPULSION


The creation of the ICON of the Non-Jewish Apollo-Christ, born on December 25th after the likeness of Apollo, and celebrated as Tammuz at Ishtar time, completed the Abomination of Desolation that ceased the temple sacrifices and replaced what God commanded with a Pig. (literally Ham on both occasions)  And as you have already seen, the Apollo-Christ Icon is seen as simply a tranferance tool for the worship of the Pope himself. (Exactly as the Abomination of Desolation is said to be patterned)


Apollo is literally the son of Zeus. (The "bá' ál shámáyîm" that the phrase "shíqqûç shômem" literally refers to)


Lamb is replaced with Ham.  Passover (called the Blood and flesh of Christ)  is replaced with a golden cup in Rome and a wafer with the actual charagma of Baal on it, straight from the "Temple Of The Sun" in ancient Babylon as if lifted from a modern archeological photo?!?!


Sixth III initiated the PRACTICE OF IDOLATRY by creating Idols (we now call "Nativity Scenes") of it's Apollo-Christ at the first Christ-Mass, thus completing and fulfilling the description of the ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION involving it's final key componant - Idolatry.  Those who refused to pay homage to this Icon were prosecuted as criminals by the Roman empire, thus fulfilling the prophecy that those who refused to worship the image would be killed. (which they were) In the millions.  Any prophetic scheme that ignores and dismisses the overtly obvious by appealing to the entirely speculative, can only be described as basically dishonest or ignore-ant. No one would ever manage their investments with such a strategy, yet some seem to think it is perfectly fine for managing such a weighty thing as eternal matters.


WHILE THE ANTI-SEMITE IGNATIUS AND HIS THEOLOGICAL DESCENDANTS

FELT IT WAS WRONG TO TALK ABOUT JESUS CHRIST

AND LIVE LIKE A JEW [DESPITE THE FACT HE WAS ONE]

THEY HAD NO PROBLEM TALKING ABOUT 

JESUS CHRIST

AND LIVING LIKE A PAGAN ROMAN !!! 


[How completely odd?]

 Sometimes a LIE is just too easy to spot


 


CHRIST-MASS IS THE "INCARNATION" OF THE SUN-GOD INTO THE "HOST"


DECEMBER 25TH IS NOT THE DAY THAT CHRIST CAME IN THE FLESH,

IT IS THE DAY THAT SOL INVICTUS (APOLLON) COMES AS CHRIST !!!

 

Rev 9:11  And they had as king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.


Rev 19:20  And the beast was taken, and ..the false prophet..which deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and worshipped his ICON. These were cast into a lake of fire


Rev 21:8  But the ..idolaters, and liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.


It is not the "Incarnation" of the Biblical Christ that is being observed on the December 25th, Christ-Mass.  It is the "Incanration" of the Sun-god (Ha Sawtawn), i.e., "Addadon" (Rev.9:11), into the "communion wafers" of these Churches that symbolically "eat" and become one with the Antichrist's god from Babel.  That is why worshipping it's Icon, gives you "the mark" of Sixth III. (who officiated it's institutionalization at the Lupercale with Idols of an Apollo-Christ)


1Co 10:21  Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils.


POPE SIXTH III REJECTED THE BLOOD AND FLESH OF CHRIST


Luk 22:13 And having gone, they found as He had told them, and they PREPARED THE PASSOVER.


Luk 22:15 And He said to them, With desire I desired to eat THIS PASSOVER with you before My suffering.


Luk 22:19 And he took bread (MATZAH), and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, THIS IS MY BODY which is given for you: *THIS DO* IN REMEMBERANCE OF ME. [NOTE: PASSOVER SEDER]


Luk 22:20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, *THIS CUP* is THE NEW TESTAMENT in MY BLOOD, which is shed for you. [THE SEDER CUP]


Mat 26:19 And the disciples did as Jesus had appointed them; and they made ready THE PASSOVER.


Mat 26:20 Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve. Mat 26:26 And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; THIS IS MY BODY.


Mat 26:27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; Mat 26:28 For THIS IS MY BLOOD of THE NEW TESTAMENT, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.


1 Co.11:24 and giving thanks, He broke and said, Take, eat; THIS IS MY BODY which is broken on behalf of you; THIS DO in remembrance of Me.


1 Co.11:25 In the same way the cup also, after supping (SEDER), saying, THIS CUP is the New Covenant in My blood; as often as you drink, THIS DO in remembrance of Me.


THIS PASSOVER - Luke 22:13,15, Mtt.26:19

THIS DO - Luke 22:19,1 Co.11:24,25 

THIS IS my body - Luke 22:19, Mtt.26:26, 1 Co.11:24,25

THIS IS my blood - Luke 22:20, Mtt.26:28, 1 Co.11:24,25


325 AD COUNCIL OF NICEA-


ROME: It is unbecoming beyond measure that on this holiest of festivals we should follow the customs of the Jews. Henceforth let us have nothing in common with this ODIOUS PEOPLE...


COMPARE:


1Jo 2:18-19 Little children, ..ye have heard that antichrist shall come, … They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, => that they might be made manifest that they were not of us <=.


QUOTE:


“We ought not, therefore, to have anything in common with the Jews”


“We desire dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detestable company of the Jews”


ANTISEMITISM. PURE and SIMPLE.


Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being => aliens from the commonwealth of Israel <=, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:


Eph 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.


Eph 2:14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one


WHY NO "CHRISTIAN" SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN HOMAGE TO ROME'S SOLAR-MASS

THE "CUP" OF GOD'S WRATH


SATURNALIA

 

QUOTE: "Odes, 3.17. ": "Tomorrow, attended by your household slaves from tasks released, cheer your soul with unmixed wine and a PIG but two months old!" END QUOTE (from: Horace The Odes and Epodes, C.E. Bennett, 1925, 237)].

 

 

THE CUP OF GOD'S WRATH

 

Rev 14:8-10 And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of  the wine of the VATIC of her fornication.  And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship ...his ICON,  ... The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation;

 

VATIC-AN * The etymology in LATIN comes from "madness, passion, or WRATH" used to describe the female prophets of the Sybline oracles and other fortune-tellers in Rome who went into ecstatic states (compared to "madness") to speak their prophecies.

 

VATIC

Main Entry: vat·ic  

Pronunciation: \'va-tik\ 

Function: adjective 

Etymology: Latin vates seer, prophet; akin to Old English wôth poetry, Old High German wuot madness  - WEBSTER'S ONLINE DICTIONARY

 

 ETYMOLOGY: From VATIC meaning "Mad", used to refer to "Madness of the Prophet". Oracle. Prophet. 

 From VAT as in "WINE VAT", in anceint usage the Prophet's "madness" often associated with or compared to drunkeness or intoxication. - Source: Cassell's Latin Dictionary

 

 

THE INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS ABOUT ROME'S SOLAR-MASS TO APOLLYON

THE INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS ABOUT "CHRIST-MASS"

(ROME'S IMPERIAL SOLAR-MASS TO APOLLYON, REV. 9:11)


(1) CHRIST-MASS is a Roman Holy day in honor of the SUN GOD of ROME.  


(2) It was begun by a man name SIXTH III, who CONTROLLED ALL BUYING AND SELLING, 


(3) and SPOKE AS GOD from THE CHAIR, speaking EX CATHEDRA 


(4) in an attempt to DENY THE FLESH OF CHRIST.  


(5) His CODEX initiated a march of oppression through history like a wild beast killing MILLIONS. 


(6) And while claiming to have THE KEYS to heaven they were the keys to  a BOTTOMLESS PIT of unending DEATH throughout history.  


(7) His "Image" has DECIEVED THE NATIONS with a FALSE Roman Icon, of (the BEAST) by it's own admission. 


(8) The "golden cup" of God's wrath comes complete with warnings about "DRINKING FROM IT" which are absolute and unconditional.  


(9)  These facts are clear and unambigious, no matter how any of us would like it to be otherwise.  The Protestant founders of America knew these texts well, and created the 1st Amendement of the US Constitution to PROTECT YOU from this MISTAKE.  


(10) The RELIGIOUS-REICH now seek not only to ENFORCE this dangerous practice on ALL AMERICANS, but they wish to NULLIFY THE US CONSTITUTION THAT PROTECTS YOU FROM IT, and force American TAX-PAYERS TO SUBSIDIZE THIS RELIGIOUS PRACTICE OF COMPULSION!

SAVE YOURSELF

Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation (genus,type, kind).


These are the words that PETER spoke to the people of Israel who had been victimized in Israel 

by the importation of this same THEOLOGY from BABYLON

during the time of CHRIST.


AND... if YOU CHOOSE NOT TO "SAVE YOURSELF" by REPENTING from the worship of THE LAKE OF FIRE

There will be no need to complain you didn't get "SAVED FROM IT" when you DIE

YOU KNOW THE TRUTH.  THE BIBLE TELLS YOU WHAT THE CONSEQUENCES ARE.


 

Make a Free Website with Yola.